private sector “health services”-copy of email

My personal judgments about him are majoritavely negative. In light of public scrutiny, I think he is rightfully being scrutinized.

It is very likely that he uses his credentials to brainwash many young male patients into accepting mental servitude to him. My suspicions were so long ago. He can thereby engage in "perpetual treatment". I see the potential for people who are not even ill, to be deemed so, for his benefit, under cover of non-profit org. status.

This was my suspicion and it has been confirmed today one step further, that families are reportedly convinced to will their possessions to his organization, bypassing their child as rightful heir.

In my opinion, he has, and is capitalizing on vulnerable people or those in compromised familial and/or financial situations. Does a cardiologist monitor a heart patient who is medicated for un-necessarily extended periods of time? Should doctors be prescribing antibiotics to a patient whose cold has long ago subsided? Of course not. That is the key to this problem. Get them on meds and trust that they’ll continue. The rest is in the hands of the law if a crime takes place.

Adult patients have adult rights. If they do not want his treatment, I believe participation cannot and should not be lawfully imposed.

Unfortunately, in the case of the Virginia Tech. assassin and others like him (who by the way fall into a minority of far less than 1% of the population), treatment or some kind of issue resolution is needed when warning signs are there. By the same measure, if you’re hearing voices not there, that is unpleasant… see a doctor.

Many have testified to the shooter’s antisocial behavior long in advance of the killings. If he had stated his concerns to the proper people, he could have taken initiative for his own emotional and behavioral problems. And conversely, others should have talked to him.

He was not of right mind-obviously.

A father of a patient under "Dr. Rick’s" care suggested (unrelated to the V.Tech sit.) that the clinic prevented what he saw as his own son’s potential life of troubles. In his particular case, that may be so. But what price is he being asked to pay under threat of otherwise being left in the street to fend for himself, unable to buy a home or pay rent in an overpriced area as ours.

As health insurance is offered to more people, I believe these individuals will not be as susceptible to this kind of servitude that appears to be going on at the two organizations which "Dr. Rick" run. Gross manipulations and violations occur there all the while supported by some families. 

Adults can alternatively seek out their own psychiatric care of choice. CA state can be a leader in this and I think we’re ready for it and want it. We certainly deserve it. Personal choice is after-all what makes a person change, whether seeking medication or not. And certain protections must be in place, most notably financial assistance to the residents and access to resources beyond his organization. He has a sick desire to run a family other than his own.

Minors are particularly vulnerable to being dumped by parents into this organization. I’m not exactly sure what the law can do for them.

For more acute situations, court mandated, I believe that Psychiatric hospitals are appropriate, run in accordance with good practice, and the individual should be released after time fitting to the patient’s needs, with the goal being doctor visits as needed.

I have received more articles concerning this particular man today, so I will read them tonight.

Posted in Health and wellness | Comments Off on private sector “health services”-copy of email

introducing the nominees

The nominees (US presidential hopefuls) seem very eager to stand out from the others… in both major parties. And, admissions from many reveal that they do in fact care to cater to the concerns of American voters. Imagine that. How nice it would be if Congress could hold the presidents to those pressing sentiments at all times after election.

“CNN” broadcast the nominee debates for the two primary American parties… the liberal Democrats and then the conservative Republicans. There are those candidates who appear to breach the divide that struck a sharp contrast between the parties just six or seven years ago.

I found about three nominees acceptable in each major party.

Election Day is still many months away. A very unique precedent of early introductions has been set, and that may be just fine.

Posted in News and politics, US Politics | Comments Off on introducing the nominees

out of control again??

Another word about ‘out of control’ stars. Posing with a knife for a photo is very strange. And repeated car crashes… well flat-out irresponsible unless someone else caused those crashes.

Posted in Entertainment, Health and wellness, News and politics | Comments Off on out of control again??

Minimum Wage Hike

Congress and the president passed the federal minimum wage increase.
Excellent triumph. There’s more to do by way of health insurance for currently uninsured.

Posted in Health and wellness, US Politics | Comments Off on Minimum Wage Hike

Why Hussein was hanged in the middle east

The former dictator of Iraq, who waged war as did the former Yugoslavian leader Mr. S. Milosevic, was actually a friend of the US at various points in history. Well, his hanging took place after a long, drawn out, and secretive trial outside of the US borders. All of a sudden, his hanging was announced to the world. Any sympathizer could do nothing to contest this decision and none was informed enough to prevent it from happening, even if that was desired. Disagreement with this verdict was widespread in Europe, and the citizens of the US really were stated neither to be in favor of it or against it. In the US, killing one person or many, is equally deemed as a deserved sentence for a killer – in many of our states, but not all. If the Hussein trial were conducted here in the USA, and not in an undisclosed location, there may have been a feeling that dissent could be exercised. But, as was the case with the Milosevic trial in The Hague, both former US president Bill Clinton and George Bush took personal initiative to end the crimes against humanity that took place. But, it is important to recognize that the US agenda to start a war against global terrorism (extremely ambitious and disputable as to how to achieve success) really began with domestic bombings of federal buildings, US naval ships elsewhere, US embassies elsewhere, world trade center attacks etc. Dislike of a foreign dictator, spurned on war, and really created impetus for US military action. Furthermore, there was economic incentive. As was the case in Yugoslavia by Britain; the US acted virtually alone to attack the geographic area where dislike of a foreign leader and terrorism seemingly merged – into what Mr. D. Cheney would come to refer to as a “nexus” for terror.

Posted in News and politics, US Politics, World News | Comments Off on Why Hussein was hanged in the middle east

“enemy combatants”

Quoting a prominent newspaper, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales was reported to have said that quote [“enemy combatants” cannot challenge their detention] unquote. While he is technically right, that a prisoner of war in custody is not subject to the same civil protections afforded by our constitution, the problem is that these individuals, if they are in fact guilty as presumed, and even worse for them perhaps not US citizens, they are still protected by the Geneva Convention and rules of war. An enemy combatant must be guilty of specifics that most of us want to agree are legitimate threats. Mr. Gonzales has been positioned by the regime, & sculpted, by politicians who favored this war and the declaration that would give unprecedented sweeping powers to leaders such as Powel, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Blair, Ashcroft, Bolton, Muller, Tenet (I’m sure I’m forgetting some for now). The point is that some are apologizing or not, resigning or not, and the important thing to remember is that our US citizenry would not want to be among any who is erroneously swept up, flown to a “torture state”, and/or held without bail or due process. The broad language used to define an enemy combatant is what causes the public to lose confidence in those individuals in US government, who should otherwise be the very best in the world at catching the right people. Even then, not making examples of detained persons, rather dealing them a prison sentence as found guilty under our judicial branch jurisdiction. It is sometimes a difficult job for our leaders to conduct government, but their job cannot be made easier at our own expense of being swept up in the arm of their hunger to punish. Our president in past days was reported to have said that Mr. Gonzales has “done nothing wrong”, but it is our job as citizens who have the power to vote, influence, dissent, and impeach at our discretion, to judge the intent of our civil servants.

Posted in News and politics, World News | Comments Off on “enemy combatants”

Iraq: On “our watch”

Our invasion of Iraq was not hindered by other countries. We are now over four years and counting into the red. We have brought the war to that region, but would it have ever met our shores if Mr. Blair and our US president hadn’t wanted to wage this ‘revolution’, starting with Iraq? If America had known of the men’s plans, would it have believed that there was any good reason for it? Or, was America all too top-heavy and ready to unleash it’s soldiers’ fury we know as the “military industrial complex”?

Posted in News and politics, US Politics, World News | Comments Off on Iraq: On “our watch”

‘out of control’ stars

In regard to the attention the mainstream mass media give to the celebrities of highest recognition among the public of late, I find the reasons for which these celebrities become the focus of analysis by the media for public view to be multiple. I think that the main reason these celebrities are said to be ‘out of control’, is because they are doing things that break the image which the media have otherwise regularly banked on. However, bad behavior solicits attention as well. Celebrities such as Ana Smith, Britney Spears, Paris Hilton and others will either play along with the image they have invented or rebel against it in a fit of defense or revenge against the public eye. It is possibly a conscious tease to those of us who focus so much of our attention to scrutinize and judge the personas we feel that we know, and perhaps we do. Nonetheless, I find the paparazzi to be vampires who really don’t care about their subjects’ mental health and the individuals of focus overall. These celebrities may in fact be trying desperately to assert their own choice and behaviors and we react often unfairly by deeming them ‘out of control’. Despite their “superstar” status, these celebrities really have no defense against photographic invasion other than assault charges filed by the celebrity, if the court recognizes them as such; and of course incidental measures taken through personal expenditures.
So is shaving your head (as Ms. Spears has recently done) a crime worthy of being deemed out of control? No, men and women can shave their heads if they want to. Is inability to parent effectively a crime, exposed by leaked audio and video? Well, not necessarily, unless someone like “Octo-mom” (as she has been named) incriminates herself against child protective services as appearing negligent if she cannot raise eight kids all by herself. In my opinion: who can? – But that’s another topic of discussion.
Let’s not forget how to separate actual crimes from strange behavior. To many of us, certain behaviors caught by news cams and paparazzi’s make the people look foolish, hence, negative publicity is almost unavoidable. Given the heights they have reached and the profits some celebs have gained, gossip columnists, image critics, publicity people etc., can easily blackmail and manipulate celebs in a profit mill, by the threat of increased exposure and loss of privacy. When your commodity is fame, as a celeb, you don’t know how to control supply and demand- that’s a big problem with an out of control and money-hungry expose. A citizen has a right to spend money, party, etc. within the law, but the media likes to take license in judging how much or how little freedom a celeb chooses to engage in. Courts and the public generally are eager to regulate that as best they can. But with media frenzies and increasing numbers of celebrities, the system fails.
Such level of fame and wealth is foreign to the vast majority of our population, yet we seem to know, when a celeb is ‘out of control’. We think so anyway. But, all too often, that determination is based on one photo where the celeb had a rough night. That is hardly fair when you look at ‘normal people’ and how ‘out of control’ they look on a more frequent basis.
The court should never be the arm of a punishing, misunderstanding and jealous populous. Nor should serious offenses be taken too lightly. That’s my opinion.
Why feel sympathy for these celebs? Well because some need care, some become victims of obscure murders as did Ms. Monroe, some fall victim to complex government plots, and others don’t know how to shield themselves from the public lives they’ve made a living from. Their very lives are often manipulated in part by the public for its own entertainment value and personal pleasures.
Another celeb who seemed ’out of control’ and associated with criminal gangsters, met a similar fate to that of Monroe. A talented actor and authentic musician, he was robbed away from my generation and his murder is yet to be solved. He spit into cameras and exuded tough-gangster mentality. And he was wrapped up in “thug life”. I speak of the late Tupac Shakur. Another singer who met his end – as did Mr. Cobain, who took his own life. That is a way of disengaging the public, which seems to be a difficult task for some of today’s celebrities, as it was for many those of past. The better celebs get at protecting their privacy, the better for all; because we don’t want them dead; and we want them “exposed” fairly, in the manner of their choosing.

Posted in Entertainment, Health and wellness, US Politics | Comments Off on ‘out of control’ stars

Johnny Depp and Michael Fox

Shortly after I posted some lines about the Litvinenko scandal, I read that Johnny Depp wishes to play the spy in a Hollywood movie script. Though Hollywood producers don’t suffer from a shortage of ideas, when real life presents its own incredulity, producers and stars will pounce to make it; but just how many times will the idea get postponed?
Michael J. Fox, another fine actor, is continuing his campaign against Parkinson’s by way of stem cell research (recent news).
And, Christopher Reeves is also fighting paralysis from his grave (through his foundation), which he and his wife Dana, founded.
It’s good to have good actors and good public servants. They all bless our country with their talents.

Posted in Entertainment, Health and wellness | Comments Off on Johnny Depp and Michael Fox

Spying on Americans?, Guantanamo Prison Camp, and US Middle East strife

Well, spying on American residents has gone on for a very long time; maybe decades. Ever since the world trade center attacks, it became publicly revealed that our government could
tap any one of our communications’ systems, claiming to gather intelligence. Today our news outlets have revealed that there will be a moratorium on the programs of such spying.

Regarding Guantanamo Bay Cuba, it is a prison camp which detained and still does detain
“suspects”- some of whom had seemingly been round-up to be made an example of, and who have no ties to the extremist group themselves. Rendition is wrong and torture is wrong, which is why I find their detention shameful. If they are guilty of no crime, then we as a nation are. I hope that Amnesty International and Cindy Sheehan’s efforts are successful and based on accurate assertions of the prison camp.

Quoting Amnesty International USA:
“Many like Murat Kurnaz, only 20 when detained, were released
without charge after years of harsh and cruel detention. Some were
as young as 13 when detained. The overwhelming majority have been
held only on suspicion, guilty until proven innocent.”

Today Condoleeza Rice will be meeting with the German Chancellor. Germany now holds the
rotating EU presidency post. Ms. Rice wishes to discuss her perception of the Palestinian Israeli
conflict.
Since the US led Iraq War and the Lebanese Israeli wars have emerged, it has become clear to me, that longtime dormant tensions among all countries in the region now overshadow the years’ old popular topic of debate in America – the Palestinian Israeli conflict.
So many of our US elders have hung on to the Israeli & Palestinian conflict which now finally needs to be ignored as though it were dead – for it has become clear that the areas of contention hold different modern geographies within all of the Arab nations.
It has been clear that the differences once discussed in such volume, had their roots in the
leaders’ hatred for one another; namely Arafat and Israel. That era is over. Those leaders are now dead.
And, Mr. Hussein, a dictator who ruled by force, is also now dead. Change for the better is in place. We need to focus mentally with the Iraqi conflict – bargain with the emerging rule of law there, and allow our US forces to be removed in phases, lest they be left to die.
The differences among many of the middle-east countries which have surfaced (since the Iraqi invasion) will become reason to negotiate new frontiers. Discussing a practically non-existent Palestinian conflict seems counter to intuition. But, contention resides within boundaries of other Middle Eastern. Not the opposing sides as depicted in stale US news programs.

Posted in News and politics, US Politics, World News | Comments Off on Spying on Americans?, Guantanamo Prison Camp, and US Middle East strife