corporations are, what did you say?

Does a corporation make a product for sale? Does a church make a product for sale?
Clearly there’s a distinction. Corporations manufacture products and/or services. In that sense they are one person, or many people, organizing together to sell product or service. Which is why the US courts should be able to recognize that churches are not corporations, unless its (a church’s) reason is to organize around selling. But, no, it does not do that. Is it to manufacture products or services? While churches organize, they neither create products nor services. But will the courts recognize this distinction? How about the courts? Are they corporations too since they are dispensing a service that is funded by a person or persons, paid for in dollars? No. Courts are neither. Lawyers are a paid-for service, and while courts require funding to operate, courts are a forum for discourse – not a product supplier!

Posted in Health and wellness, News and politics, Organizations, Religion and reverence, Uncategorized, US Politics, World News | Comments Off on corporations are, what did you say?

UK + 1, UN + 1, US + 0.5

Why is it that anyone ought to know who ordered gassings in Syria?
Only then, would the United States’ government accusations hold credence.
Now that Assad has volunteered to allow the UN to have its way with his country,
it is a major breakthrough as he clearly sacrificed in the interest of avoiding WW3.
He’s a hero to his backers and to rebels who take up arms against him.
That is good, particularly since Assad is welcoming the collaboration, as we wait to see if
he can or will sustain military law. It has already been made clear, that his voluntary
concession will require a tall order of him and of the United Nations, as
war among rebels and government forces has been raging onward in the
country. It is the better way to sort through their issues without US military bombardment.
That would be totally unfair, particularly with what the UN now knows, that we do not.
The processes and evolutions in Syria will require great patience.
It is important that Russia remain critical of the US,
because disruptions in response to “failure” on the part of Assad, who is acting responsibly,
is evil.
Why raise the “bar” against Assad? It is to afford the luxury of pointing blame for his
country’s crisis. Are we going to do that in Egypt as well? With the intent of
keeping war a supposedly justified and measured response to “failure”, while
peace is at work, would be wrong.
So Russia is proving to be right, more and more that each day pass.
It seems we in the informed public, can be rest assured that the UN will be
able to work with Assad, no matter how long it take.
Otherwise, the same old scenario will continue… having read some of the details in brief,
if one reads between the lines, it sounds all too familiar…
Taking war “off the table” is exactly right. Insisting on being able to choose war at any
later date, (despite Assad capitulating in every regard) is evil. Good, is what is
happening now, thanks to negotiations; good, is US restraint.
Good would be giving Assad the option and protection needed for his exile or
imprisonment (whichever the UN decides, based on their findings).
If my country is defending and choosing to arm perpetrators of violence, killing the peaceful,
and dishonoring public (including Congressional) sentiment, I want
to know about it every time it happens. The US government can bide its time with power play,
but we citizens cannot.
The UN findings must be the first step in reaching cooperation among powers. Based even
on who is guilty (Assad or the rebels) – and my personal belief happens to be that
it is the rebels; Syria remains a complex battlefield.
For all the people trapped there, or those having fled, the problem is really big
and world leaders must recognize that those victims and refugees do not have the luxury of time
that you would like for yourselves.
They need some of the wealth of nations that are among the Arab League. I’m
disgusted that some in the middle-east live like kings, while others live worse than slaves.
How to get financials and resources to the right people
depends on leaders continuing to dialogue, with the right interests in mind.
[Update 2014: Unfortunately, one major middle-eastern power nation has refused to offer financial assistance to Syria. This cannot continue. I agree with my government’s apparent move to look for donors in that region, as was reported in this week’s news (1/21/2014).]

Posted in Health and wellness, News and politics, Organizations, Religion and reverence, Uncategorized, US Politics, World News | Comments Off on UK + 1, UN + 1, US + 0.5

Geneva

The public news of the progress in the negotiations taking place in Switzerland is encouraging. Is it naive to be hopeful? We shall see. We shall also see [hopefully] who used the sarin gas.

Posted in Health and wellness, News and politics, Organizations, Uncategorized, US Politics, World News | Comments Off on Geneva

Syria and the US negotiating?

No one, more than a few in the United States have an itch you could say, to go to war with Assad – and win Russian support in the process. Most obvious and outspoken: John Kerry.
Russia, China, Iran and most anyone, want the threat of (war now or later) removed, as does Assad, since he’s first in the firing line. This is so because Assad, [whether proven guilty of gassing] or rebels’ proven responsible for it, is intent on one result – preventing the United States from going to war with them, even if that means that Assad diminishes his own arsenal of weapons [used or unused] in the process of the deal to avoid military strikes on an already suffering country. Reassurances from leaders to Americans that no US boots will be put on the ground there, is not enough of a promise for the United States’ people either. Assad’s agreement to give up his arms is quite a responsible decision. I wonder if the US would ever agree to do something as that, if on the “receiving” end. Made clear was when the US announced several days ago to Americans that it would not work within the United Nations’ Security Council in deciding its own course of action. That kind of rogue mentality, brought down middle east leaders in recent years. With this swift progress in recent days, relating to US understanding that it cannot dictate all matters with regard to Assad, after removal of its imminent threat of war “from the table” and failure in drumming up citizen support, hope is growing for peace with each day. That is a victory for all parties. With regard to Syrian president Assad, I’m sure that he is well aware that admitting guilt even where none may exist, is in the interest of preventing bombardment. That is most likely why he has agreed to talks and agreements, not as an admission, rather a solution. If his arsenal was even never used in gassing people, he has said he will give up his arsenal in the interest of preventing bombardment. Give up weapons at the request [or demand] of another nation? I doubt the US ever would. Congratulations to Assad for seizing the opportunity early – before the situation changed for worse. And if he gassed his people, I would certainly like to know why he would do such a crazy thing – knowing full well that it could be cause for the US to destroy him. If he wanted war, he’d simply say something like,
“yeah those were authorized by me”.
Obviously he seems to say none such thing, and is interested in peace. Many who have spoken out in opposition to any war are praised – one being the Catholic Church. As it is, the displacement of people before any bombardment is grand and tragic; but, I can think of no better way for their lives to be preserved, than seeking refuge elsewhere, even if many fled to Iraq. Strange and telling don’t you think? I certainly think it is indicative of not just middle east strife, but also US threats.

Posted in Health and wellness, News and politics, Organizations, Uncategorized, US Politics, World News | Comments Off on Syria and the US negotiating?

lip service

Unlike a marriage [which is exempt from this topical blog entry], representative government is often, and has been all too often, big on promises for Americans and short on delivering them in the way the lip service has scripted them. A spouse does what a government cannot and visa- versa. But, how can we in the United States, achieve everything we dream and hope for, while waged wars all over the globe degrade our wealth? Once the dream is owned entirely by any government, the population owns the nightmare. That’s not the plunder we agreed to. So how can we preserve our treasures? How can we leave others to peace? How can we prevent millions from scattering out of fear that they’re going to be bombed? Let’s begin with answers to those questions.

Posted in Health and wellness, News and politics, Religion and reverence, Uncategorized, US Politics, World News | Comments Off on lip service

sometimes divorce was justified… but, consider the new covenant

Important paragraph added on 10/18/2013.
Is a battle of the sexes still possible after nuptials are exchanged?
It happens. There are vengeful and hostile people who would burn their own marriage just as easily as they would create a public scandal with a virtual stranger at the center of it.
Does this mean that all public discourse of a brother’s or sister’s sin within a marriage is a smoke screen to allow one to revel in a fit of ones own revenge – in denial of one’s own share in the immorality of the matter? Are all women out to blame their men? Are all men out to slay unrighteous women?
No, no and no, but women today engage in all the same sins that men do, while other women and other men do refrain at many given moments. That’s my personal determination, but, I understand that not all people are on a “mission to burn” members of the opposite sex, through embarrassment and mudslinging, as we too often find commonplace and acceptable in public shaming… in the United States as one example.
So, specifically, how does one deal with the sins of one’s spouse best? What additional sins might he or she be discounting in his or her own self-examination? Many sins, as they are less recognizable to the population, are more severe or equally severe offenses to our Lord, than those we often talk of.
These denials are sinful in themselves.
Through personal wars, media frenzies, and “shit-storms”, we can effectively chastise a person into turning toward sin as remedy, when we carelessly marginalize people (in acts perpetrated and motivated by envy for example).
Some people allow their spouse’s sins to proliferate as a means of being “free” to sin themselves; a “pass go and collect” type of mentality that harms. By the way, unmarried people and married people are equally susceptible to the lures of sin. Not being married is not a sin, and being married is not necessarily virtuous.
Are we to celebrate sin at certain times, and not at others?
Worst, in my opinion, is a spouse’s giving no credit or praise for the spouse’s progress [even eradication or improvements] against a lifelong battle vs. the fallen angel’s work against us all, which actively divided them once. Give praise for every victory!
Timing is critical in providing praise and encouragement. Punishment after the loved one’s defeat (even if not complete) of a sin, while in repentance, is a violation of the spouse’s victory. That is a cruel, unloving act!
It is the devil at work in such a case, where he cleverly tempts you [the spouse] to punish and undermine your bond and promises to one another – having married, for better or for worse… don’t forget.
Remember: one’s best efforts to help the partner with sin may not occur overnight. Before shaming or embarrassing your partner publicly, be mindful of your own sin. Dialogue; and reject the illusion that you can immediately control your spouse’s behaviors. As much as we might want to, we cannot “control” other people with the expectations of a 24/7 “McDonald’s” “how may I help you” service timetable. “McDonald’s” after all, has a far easier task of accomplishing immediate pleasing effects, than a marriage. You can be instrumental in positive changes in your marriage, but “people are not machines” [I quote a phrase from Pastor Joseph Prince] (applied in a different context). Don’t forget that God heals sinners according to His method, using you as an instrument if you reject sin, but also with the help of religious leaders. Sin in one family might not be present in another family. And so no one, but you, can reject it. It is each couple’s responsibility to themselves, and later, others.
Be fair to your partner, and seek help together as a pair, in private AND among friends. Isolating your spouse or friend is not God’s desire for you; rather it is the devil’s desire. He [God] made us to live in community’s that should strengthen our ability to love and to forgive. Divorce is an option in many cases, but it breaks the New Covenant we have with God.
We are designed to be sociable. We must be humble enough to recognize where and how sin attacks, in many shapes and forms, through man’s and woman’s weaknesses. Neither sex is exempt. So leave the “gender battle” between the sexes behind! Encourage healthy approaches and togetherness. Allow your partner to point out your sins, and leave the delicate egos behind. After all, no one will be more courageous to criticize you, than your spouse; and, secondly your child or children. That’s how it should be. You married him or her, didn’t you?
Don’t make the mistake of assuming that your marriage is beyond repair. But first, own up to your own sins, and be merciful to the person you committed your life to. Reject the temptation to publicize your spouse’s sins in mass media – doing so might give birth to false testimony and exaggerations that you SHOULD later feel guilty about. Only through love, will your partner turn away from sin. And your capacity to forgive him or her, will find rewards as you together conquest against sin.
Sin “loves” to get between you and your partner, and make you believe that the sinner is evil and enslaved forever. But this is just not true. The sinner needs to choose righteousness WITH you, and be permitted to recognize and see your best efforts to correct your sins exhibited also. You must be credible to help your spouse. You must see that blame is shared. Maybe you’re not spending enough time with your spouse? Maybe there’s deceit and secrecy. Maybe the guys or gals at work are getting more attention than you are giving your spouse and children (if there are children) at home? When both do NOT reject the sins together, BOTH will be in bondage, and, BOTH will question each person’s respective love for each other.
I don’t believe that a married couple can disown one person’s sin in the relationship, while permitting those of the other to grow. This would be a stimulus for eventual divorce. Enduring relationships “see” causes for a person’s weakness, reasons the sin is there, explanations for why the weakness in the first place. Often times we marry someone for help with this area of our life. Don’t rush to abandon the person you married. The best at it are able to share recognition of the sin, in order to overcome the sin together and grow even stronger as one.
Love is patient. Love is kind.
Forgive the sinner, as generously as you would want to be forgiven.
And go to church! So, that you can build up your relationship on firm ground, as a couple, knowing that sin can and will come about in another circumstance “tomorrow”, but only if you allow it to.
Church going should not end with the wedding ceremony. It is all too needed, long after it, until we die.
And it is never too late to reconcile for yours.
I’ve added this paragraph and edits above, on 10/18/2013. I was unaware until now, that only the Old Testament approved of divorce granting. With the new covenant with Christ [which does not permit divorce], we must do all what we can to preserve marriage and to keep it a holy institution, never deprived of love and mutual respect. For this reason, I’ve also edited the title of this post. Now I know that divorces occur in our day, and that the children of God are forgiven for many of our sins. But, we must use all our wills to honor our new covenant and we must seek forgiveness for all of our breaches, whether we are living a single or a married life.

Posted in Health and wellness, Religion and reverence, Uncategorized | Comments Off on sometimes divorce was justified… but, consider the new covenant

Why dialogue? Because it should work.

Having dismissed claims of using weapons against his own people, it seems that the president of Syria might have welcomed an intervention that does not target him or his regime. But would this work while the gun is pointed at him? [Update 2014: Fortunately, once the gun was removed from his head, he welcomed foreigners into his country. Looks like it became a win-win situation].

Posted in Health and wellness, News and politics, Organizations, Uncategorized, US Politics, World News | Comments Off on Why dialogue? Because it should work.

The results of United Nations’ fact finding should not be dismissed. Why not? Because otherwise our military cannot properly clarify if Assad could be an ally.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

please UN

United Nations – please do something to protect those who are dying in Syria, and Egypt. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on please UN

making matters tough

If the United Nations does not announce its expert findings, Syria may have no military threats from the US lifted. If innocence is proven, the US may still not lift the threat. This is a real problem. And if the US does not cede power to the United Nations’ security council, then we could see a real conflict emerge.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on making matters tough