is exporting democracy obligatory?

No.
In support of America, to anyone reading, I ask that all our troops return ASAP.
Exporting democracy in the form that we’ve been seeing is not obligatory.

Iran’s president announced in a public speech that “his country could develop nuclear weapon if it wanted, but that it does not have such intention”. Americans should probably acknowledge that it can. And any immigrant group who publicize in our streets today, supporting or suggesting that the USA depose the Iranian president, should take a good hard look, and thank the citizens of this country (perhaps each of them included) for paying taxes that have already gone to fight enough wars to “last” many lifetimes. I hope that they as I, learn to resent US tax dollar applied use as continued “democracy exportation” to other countries. This is where we live, and manners alone, should hold us to rules of engagement, even in the USA. Americans can be asked of no more. Don’t you (expletive-verb) forget it.

Posted in Health and wellness, News and politics, Religion and reverence, US Politics, World News | Comments Off on is exporting democracy obligatory?

Freedom

I have recently learned that February 11th marks the day of remembrance known as “Victory of the Revolution Day”, to Iranian people. Amnesty International USA has asked me and other Americans to post about this day on our personal blog’s. I meet this request for this issue.

Many Iranian citizens, like many American’s, hunger for personal freedoms, and these Iranian’s have a tenacity and fierce determination to preserve that voice as evidenced by their current protests. Many of them demonstrably believe that their government is corrupt and suppressive, or even totalitarian. They appear to be incredibly frustrated by an inability to shape their government policy and common future according to their standards. To complicate matters, in my view, they fear further US economic sanctions and fear public disfavor by America and other nations, regarding their government’s uranium enrichment program.

The Iranian public must however learn to live with this disfavor, as all Nations throughout History have faced disfavor at one time or another; sometimes for many years. That is sometimes a fact of life. I think in recent times, America is learning that repealing The Patriot Act, fighting extraordinary rendition, maintaining safety, upholding law and justice, fighting for the innocent, and operating day to day, would all be factors that contribute to making us the free society that we appear to be from the perspective of other countries. Fortunately, our elected officials cherish these same freedoms in their own lives, but do we have them? I never met a politician who enjoyed public embarrassment or jail. We too must hold them to account. The intellectuals of Iran are aware that freedom must be written about and spoken of, for ages, and some of them are suffering as they speak today. They might best expect their government to change slowly. But Iranian’s are also a patient people. A war, as American’s have debated with Iranians would not only be stupid, fought on the ground, in the air, in the sea etc. It would also be a far worse alternative for all parties involved. So, I hope that rapid freedom expansion in Iran is not too forcefully demanded, as it might provoke instability. On the other hand, a realistic understanding that America is not as free as it appear to be… though maybe should be, would help both Nations’ people.

No longer can Iran be the oil rich nation to supply oil to the US. In my view, US wars have solidified that choice for wrong or for right. Frightening to admit, if America used the same argument as was used a few years ago, as a basis for invading Iraq, now, applied to Iran, the war would be yet another cause for America to suffer human resources and life yet again in epic proportion.

With regard to protest in the streets, if we started a war with every country that currently has protesting in the streets… we’d be bankrupt and left for dead, with no one to rush to aid us.

It is for this reason and definitely others, that Iran must fight its own regime as it does, and unfortunately not expect much assistance or reciprocity.
We cannot overhaul their government and Iranian youth must realize that America cannot be expected to give it freedom. They must create their own freedom. They should not expect rapid social change, should not martyr themselves for it, but they can work together and know that American’s who love their own freedom, will congratulate them at the finish line; that is if America makes it there as well.

What our government can do is to encourage the Iranian government to respect civil rights. Change must come from their civilians however, not from a liberating army (USA). A liberating army winds up having to hold the reins, and we cannot do that for every country that disrespect civil rights by estimation. It is a particular challenge for the USA, as we leave the oil rich nations off of our agenda, toward our own sustainable energy production and consumption. Iran must work with the Arab league to fund poor nations, to meet the communal goals of the region, and to build their own economy.

Iran’s current civil strife reminds me in several ways of United States History, at a time where only Americans could help themselves. Martin Luther King Jr. was killed for his outspokenness defending and championing civil rights. Individuals like him, outside of the church, defending social justice, and their brothers, were murdered in the streets as well (Kennedy). Harvey Milk fought for gay rights, which without him would have not allowed for gay pride parading in the streets. Decades later, murders of civil rights pushers, are shrouded with secrecy; but they are through declassified files possibly solved crimes.

Outspoken activists in Iran have been arrested and accused of orchestrating violence and there appears to be a great divide between what the youth in the country want, and what the government, (made up of an older populous), wants. That is much the same in the USA. Is the USA really more free? If there’s a lesson, could it be that young and old must work together to shape public policy constructively? Can young and old there dialogue? Yes. I think that may work. And if their government use murder as totalitarians often do, then the International Court must get involved.

Posted in News and politics, US Politics, World News | Comments Off on Freedom

Grammy’s 2010

“Pink”. “Pink” was so good, it’s no wonder why I’m not surprised that some people are now complaining about her performance.
Not that it makes sense, but that’s why it almost seems expected that people would rag on her. But anyone who watched the performance on TV, saw heads turn and eyes following every spin and twist above ground as she dipped into water below, and sang without any interference to her vocals. Really, she nailed it. Good job “Pink”.

Posted in Entertainment, Music | Comments Off on Grammy’s 2010

a word about acting

Mel Gibson. Mel received negative press for an under the influence outburst. Warranted accusations they may be; however, there is one thing that this fine actor has proven. Mel has proven that acting requires courage. His real life outburst may have been a courageous outburst that was provoked. His craft is proof that his real life does “mingle” at times with his passion and genius for acting. Can there really be a divorce of the two? Not always. Probably not; and that is why I still support Mr. Charlie Sheen with his public outbursts as well. There is a place for “bad boys”. That is Hollywood so long they can deliver fine characterizations. Is there a place for therapy? You bet. But, don’t sell these guys short. Give them what they need: A place to act, and a reason to be relatively more sober. And for all the rest, you just haven’t been caught, or you’ve been real careful.

Posted in Entertainment, News and politics | Comments Off on a word about acting

and for the unemployed and too sick to work?

What was voted for the unemployed, or too sick to work, in the Senate today? For those citizens unable to afford any plan what so ever. What for them?
This is a serious question. Are they to continue going to emergency rooms and driving up public costs and individual debt? Does the healthcare bill have a taxpayer funded plan that can prevent private insurers from raising premiums on us? One that provides for the weakest among us and keeps private insurers honest in their coverage of people, who buy individually, or who have employer sponsored plans of care? This is what was promised America. Must employees turn down a job because they don’t like their employer selected plan? To keep prices affordable, we must eliminate the dire need some folks have by giving a standard to uninsured people, and an incentive for them to attain a superior private plan. And to prevent a two class system, allow for Medicare to regulate private insurers by reviewing and controlling the private insurance co. and drug premiums. Government must regulate the insurers. I hope this has been achieved so that individuals and employers can shop for what is best for each of them.
Posted in Health and wellness | Comments Off on and for the unemployed and too sick to work?

consumer driven democracy

Senator R. Wyden understands correctly that trusting the individual consumer makes for a free society. Those individuals who like the options that their employer gives them for healthcare will keep that job. And those who don’t want their employer to provide them with healthcare won’t find any more reason to stay with that particular employer on those grounds. So give employers the choice to attract talent, not healthcare need or even desperation of their employees. And, give emplyees and unemployed a free market health care system. And, provide some competing plans outside the labor "umbrella". Senator Wyden’s got it right, and he understands the principle of libertarians. It was my hope that other senators would be as bold in their interpretation of a free society.
Posted in Health and wellness | Comments Off on consumer driven democracy

nut-cases using the N word, (either one)

To all those nut-cases out there, who have been throwing the word “Nazi” around lately to libel a president this country elected, this question for you: why aren’t you standing in someone else’s corner, advocating that he get something long overdue-healthcare, instead of libeling our president? Anyone who uses “that word” automatically conjures up ignorance and vulgarity. You look plain stupid. To compare hate crimes of past with a populist president who is making sure that those people who you obviously don’t give a shit about, a plan of health care… imagine that. It never fails to baffle me how people resort to the word “Nazi” to bitch about anything they disapprove of, and can’t articulate why, in normal nomenclature. Didn’t get cream in your coffee, like you asked? “Nazi”. Got ripped off at the store? “Nazi”. I’ve heard that label used in instances I never did ever understand. Put your irrational fears aside. The Nazi fringe in our country is not in office, let’s be clear about the difference. Nor would a Nazi party ever likely support anything this president is proposing. Pissed off that your government wants to reduce healthcare foibles? Must be a “Nazi” conspiracy… orchestrated from the bastard’s grave. Come on people! Drop the old label. It’s about as both off base and offensive as the other “N” word. If you should ever be water-boarded, then I’ll listen. You call your captor a “Nazi”; or any of the other totalitarians by name who have inflicted bodily harm throughout history. Then, I’ll be on your side; but, now you-all who use that word in your protest recently on Washington, sound like a bunch of “mamby-pamby’s”. Are you serious?! I ought to support this president even more than I have, ’cause I just don’t get what you’re all bitching about. All that comes across is that you’re mad as hell. You’re probably the same stock who pays the teenage dope fiend your last grand, to go and paint a swastika in his school bathroom, so that you can still claim that the Nazi party is overhauling your country.

Posted in News and politics, US Politics | Comments Off on nut-cases using the N word, (either one)

Medicare “Advantage” Medicare

In addition to the views in the previous blog, the president has expressed wanting to reform Medicare Advantage plans. I find this an agreeable intention, but he must couple this control of funds with a genuine preservation of Medicare for all. As a public servant, you can’t ask people to give up Medicare Advantage and not provide them with a government plan for each and every uninsured American. People who have private insurance aren’t generally going to give that up for a government plan, so there’s no argument that gives merit to denying rudimentary insurance, tax payer funded, to a poor individual and/or child. There simply isn’t any good argument that discredits such action.

Posted in Health and wellness, News and politics, US Politics | Comments Off on Medicare “Advantage” Medicare

healthcare?

If the president won’t extend Medicare to all anymore, and if he’s not interested in providing us who don’t have it, it, who is he trying to please? I’m genuinely wondering who he’s interested in pleasing. I haven’t seen information that would indicate bribes originating from private insurance companies. But, from hundreds of emails he and his team have sent me, I thought that he was going to craft a plan for the poor, interested in pushing through a “base-line” plan for the uninsured, paid for by Medicare expansion. If I were ultra-left, I’d be furious. I’m puzzled as a centrist leaning social conservative. Regardless of political allegiance, I have to say that this appears very awkward. Those who can afford insurance aside from a government option, don’t need to be discussed, they’re fine. And people who don’t have insurance are mad for reasons other than that which I don’t quite understand. If they don’t want insurance, they have a right not to have it, but do they have a right to prevent their fellow citizens the fundamental right, if those others can’t afford healthcare? I don’t think so. It just has become evident that if not this president, then no one will there be who will ever fight for automatically funded insurance for all. This is the last chance. I won’t support reform after this chance, and I don’t think anyone else in America will either. The president may squander the unique position he’s been given to utilize the only leverage he has, to rally behind Dennis Kucinich. He doesn’t need to pitch something to the public. He just needs to get behind the Congressman who has demonstrated clarity on the issue. [update 1.20.2014: Dennis Kucinich’s Medicare-for-all fight did not receive enough support. Abandoning hopes led constituents such as me to oppose what would be come to be known as Obama-Care”. This abandoned agenda resulted in some of the far left, the emergent “Tea Party”, most conservatives, and many third-party voters, to agree on destroying what has evolved to be called “Obama-Care”. One thing it is not, is “universal healthcare” as could have otherwise been crafted. We will see what comes of this “Obama-Care”.]

Posted in Health and wellness, News and politics, US Politics | Comments Off on healthcare?

My vote 2009

I voted for the Green party candidate. I liked the principles that Nader/Gonzales were campaigning on. I support our president Obama and hope that he achieves great things for us. Even though John Edwards faced embarrasement and was not elected, I felt that he was on target with the issues and certainly capable of office. Nevermind that however. As a Libertarian, I hope for an embrace of ideals based on shrewd capitalism and prudence, which respect to limitations, social responsibility, and repsect for fundamental human rights. That is the America that I know. 
Posted in News and politics | Comments Off on My vote 2009